Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'
Magnitude ...... 6+
Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico
Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct
Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct
Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area
Duffy
(10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'
Magnitude ...... 6+
Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico
Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct
Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct
Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area
Duffy
You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon?
That's a pretty small window.
Roger
(10-03-2018, 12:40 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'
Magnitude ...... 6+
Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico
Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct
Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct
Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area
Duffy
You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon?
That's a pretty small window.
Roger
I'm pretty sure he meant degrees. He used ' instead of °.
BTW, ° can be had by holding <alt> and typing 248 on the ten key pad. Gotta love those ascii codes.
Brian
(10-03-2018, 05:00 AM)Skywise Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 12:40 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'
Magnitude ...... 6+
Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico
Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct
Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct
Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area
Duffy
You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon?
That's a pretty small window.
Roger
I'm pretty sure he meant degrees. He used ' instead of °.
BTW, ° can be had by holding <alt> and typing 248 on the ten key pad. Gotta love those ascii codes.
Brian
Yes, it was meant to represent degrees.
Thanks guy's... sorry for the confusion.
Duffy
(10-03-2018, 11:05 AM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 05:00 AM)Skywise Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 12:40 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'
Magnitude ...... 6+
Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico
Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct
Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct
Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area
Duffy
You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon?
That's a pretty small window.
Roger
I'm pretty sure he meant degrees. He used ' instead of °.
BTW, ° can be had by holding <alt> and typing 248 on the ten key pad. Gotta love those ascii codes.
Brian
Yes, it was meant to represent degrees.
Thanks guy's... sorry for the confusion.
Duffy
That was my assumption but I wanted to make sure.
Roger
(10-03-2018, 03:25 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 11:05 AM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 05:00 AM)Skywise Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 12:40 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ] (10-02-2018, 08:56 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]Long / Lat ...... 101'51'W - 18'29'N +/- 2'
Magnitude ...... 6+
Location ......... Coahuayutla de Jose, Guerrero, Mexico
Start date ....... 21:00 UTC 2nd Oct
Expiry date ..... 21:00 UTC 9th Oct
Note - data correlation on co-ordinates 122'09'W - 37'43'N
San Leandro, San Francisco bay area
Duffy
You're stating location +/- 2 minutes of lat/lon?
That's a pretty small window.
Roger
I'm pretty sure he meant degrees. He used ' instead of °.
BTW, ° can be had by holding <alt> and typing 248 on the ten key pad. Gotta love those ascii codes.
Brian
Yes, it was meant to represent degrees.
Thanks guy's... sorry for the confusion.
Duffy
That was my assumption but I wanted to make sure.
Roger
No problem, took it as a compliment of your faith in my abilities.... but I now stand corrected
Duffy
That is the first prediction here in a very long time. If there was more interest (and posts) on earth science including earthquakes that have already occurred, I would post more. For instance, the M7.5 left-lateral quake with tsunami (and gravity-driven deformation and liquefaction?), in Indonesia, is interesting.
Chris
(10-03-2018, 06:33 PM)Island Chris Wrote: [ -> ]That is the first prediction here in a very long time. If there was more interest (and posts) on earth science including earthquakes that have already occurred, I would post more. For instance, the M7.5 left-lateral quake with tsunami (and gravity-driven deformation and liquefaction?), in Indonesia, is interesting.
Chris
Yes and if there were more predictions posted here I would have more evaluations to do.
Win win situation!
Roger
(10-03-2018, 06:45 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 06:33 PM)Island Chris Wrote: [ -> ]That is the first prediction here in a very long time. If there was more interest (and posts) on earth science including earthquakes that have already occurred, I would post more. For instance, the M7.5 left-lateral quake with tsunami (and gravity-driven deformation and liquefaction?), in Indonesia, is interesting.
Chris
Yes and if there were more predictions posted here I would have more evaluations to do.
Win win situation!
Roger
Data Correlation... M 3.9 4km SW of Tres Pinos, CA - 121.359'W - 36.765'N
I included a data correlation location in this prediction as an indicator for conformation or adjustment purposes. On 2nd October at 12:38 UTC, it was dawn in San Leandro, San Francisco Bay area, and sunrise in Coahuayutla de Jose on the co-ordinates of this prediction. As of 12:38 UTC today (5th Oct), it was dawn in Tres Pinos on the USGS co-ordinates posted above, yet it was still sunrise at this time in Coahuayutla de Jose. This data correlation relates to a parallel terminator threshold connection, and indicates no adjustment is necessary to the prime prediction location (sunrise is holding where it should be... and the dawn threshold is adjusting in relation to the suns southward motion).
Tres Pinos will stay in sync with Coahuayutla de Jose until 8th October.
Duffy
(10-05-2018, 03:03 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 06:45 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ] (10-03-2018, 06:33 PM)Island Chris Wrote: [ -> ]That is the first prediction here in a very long time. If there was more interest (and posts) on earth science including earthquakes that have already occurred, I would post more. For instance, the M7.5 left-lateral quake with tsunami (and gravity-driven deformation and liquefaction?), in Indonesia, is interesting.
Chris
Yes and if there were more predictions posted here I would have more evaluations to do.
Win win situation!
Roger
Data Correlation... M 3.9 4km SW of Tres Pinos, CA - 121.359'W - 36.765'N
I included a data correlation location in this prediction as an indicator for conformation or adjustment purposes. On 2nd October at 12:38 UTC, it was dawn in San Leandro, San Francisco Bay area, and sunrise in Coahuayutla de Jose on the co-ordinates of this prediction. As of 12:38 UTC today (5th Oct), it was dawn in Tres Pinos on the USGS co-ordinates posted above, yet it was still sunrise at this time in Coahuayutla de Jose. This data correlation relates to a parallel terminator threshold connection, and indicates no adjustment is necessary to the prime prediction location (sunrise is holding where it should be... and the dawn threshold is adjusting in relation to the suns southward motion).
Tres Pinos will stay in sync with Coahuayutla de Jose until 8th October.
Duffy
Ok but I still don't understand the logic of your method.
Quakes do not happen more often at dawn or sunset so why is the correlation significant?
Roger