10-06-2018, 09:36 PM
(10-06-2018, 09:22 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ](10-06-2018, 05:29 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ](10-06-2018, 09:51 AM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]No problem Duffy, just glad you're back.(10-06-2018, 05:06 AM)Skywise Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, that is sound advice... thank you.(10-06-2018, 12:51 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ]But you're always welcome here (as long as Skywise agrees!)
I'm good with things so far.
And, I also do not fully understand your method, Duffy. But I got part of it. But like Roger said, it's not important at this time. No need wasting your time trying to explain things. Save your energy on working out the kinks in your system. Once you start making regular statistically good hits, then we'll start bugging for the details.
Brian
Apologies Roger... "my bad" as they say.
Duffy
Do you have a cumulative list of past predictions that I can start working with?
Roger
I did not retain my prediction records after 2016... old news you understand.
The original post are still recorded here though, might be best with a fresh start !
Duffy
As you wish, it just means it will take longer to reach a conclusion.
That's not a problem, just an observation.
Roger