[Roger Hunter]

(02-10-2016, 01:10 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(02-10-2016, 01:05 AM)Duffy Wrote:

(02-09-2016, 11:09 PM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(02-07-2016, 11:44 PM)Duffy Wrote: Hi Roger,

            As you have been good enough to give me encouragement to continue, I will be equally so by following this on a factual basis were possible, and avoid speculating on something that I am not familiar with, or the data does not relate to.  I brought real-time observable data to the forum, and I am able to speculate it's meaning, because I have recorded the same data and tested the same anomalous readings.  The data is highly suggestive of known, and unknown influences which correlate with tectonic events and instabilities under the Earth's surface. I have brought this forward for testing by others to see if another explanation can be found for the signal breaks and the unusual structural changes that corrolate with locations I have suggested, in the online Solar wind data.   This relates to my hypothesis, I have tried to tear this apart myself, and not succeeded, it is for others to now try and do the same .. if another explanation can be found, it means I will have to re-evaluate my data, if not .. I will " then" speculate it's nature.

I'm not quite sure of your meaning " pick a time at random, it will be twilight somewhere in the world ", it's obvious, it will always be twilight somewhere in the World, but,  If I have specifically stated three locations, I don't know how picking a random time would automatically relate to landing on one of these at twilight !!, unless we have cross communication here, and you are referring to daylight ?.

I too, do not consider a favoured time of day for Earthquakes, but my observations suggest that the majority of low magnitude quakes occur within the twilight regions of the known and "as yet" unknown terminator.  I have not kept an up todate record of this, but it might be something you could run through your program, as I would be interested to see the results .. unless you have already tried this and know differently .. in which case, I will stand corrected.  

                                                                ...................................................................................

This is for anybody that has decided to go along with my suggestion ... A shut down of satellite data occurred today at 07:20 UT, I do not know the official explanation for this, but I did record something of interest during the same time period, which I have saved for further scrutiny should the day come, my findings are taken seriously.

If you set the August map to the 6th at 19:20 UT ... and the present map to the 7th at 07:20 UT.   In the August map, you can see the outer edge of the civil twilight zone is in contact with the Cook Strait, New Zealand, and departing.  In the present map, you can see the leading edge of civil twilight zone making contact with the North coast of North Island. You may have noticed, there is a gap between the two zones, my data at this point shows an anomaly is present, and the gap in question !!. I could speculate how this could relate to satellite signal loss, but as I have mentioned, it is recorded for future reference.   As I type this, I notice a similar occurrence has taken place in the Solar data at 21:20 UT, Puerto Rico (spelt it right this time !) is currently in the twilight zones of the August map, and I have recorded a similar anomaly again !!.  Finally, a bottle neck occurred in the magnetic field data between 13:00 UT and 14:15 UT which corresponded with nautical and astronomical twilight transit time over Tajigistan, and conveniently finished with an M4.5 quake in the Hindu Kush region.  There is no guarantee that I have calculated the locations correctly, but so far, Solar data seems to respond accordingly.

I know this idea may sound ridiculous to some, and I fully understand any negativity .. but I think it only fair that I be judged on this when it has been tested over several days, but it would be appreciated if anyone acknowledged their participation. 

Think I will go and watch the Super Bowl on TV now, might see a few more left fielders in action there .

Thank You, 

Duffy,

(02-09-2016, 02:16 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(02-09-2016, 11:25 AM)Duffy Wrote: Up date ... I am currently recording a major structural anomaly forming ,which appears to resemble structures I have associated in the past to tectonic events of  mag 6 +, though the size of this signal indicates a higher value.  I cannot define true location, but preceding Sunrise signal may indicate Central America, within the next hour from the time of this post.

Duffy,

It would appear that I recorded an amalgamation of 5's within the terminator zones, but I don't think I can claim a mag 15 for my troubles  .  I am up dating  because this seems to be resulting in a butterfly effect (will explain later), new anomalies are currently forming again, and may  now repeat the process of 5's along the Eastern terminator zones, structure is similar ... the first one has produced spikes which may result in events of unknown magnitude at approx 14:22 UT and 14:43 UT.

Duffy

Duffy;

See if I have this correct.

You see an anomaly on your traces and check the terminator for likely locations. Later you check the published quakes to see what was in those locations.

This is a good way to fool yourself. The terminator is a 90 degree circle with a fairly wide width so the chances of finding something somewhere are very high. It's also difficult to check, computer-wise. Accepting low mag events raises the odds quite high too.

Roger

 Roger,


Are we talking about fooling myself, or fools rush in .. How nigh eve do you think I am ? .... PLEASE tell me you didn't pass judgement on my second up date before an official time stamp has had chance to materialise !! 


Duffy,

Duffy;

No, I'm trying to explain why you seem to get hits.

Roger

Update: Just had a 6.3 in Chile

Roger