[Duffy]

(11-06-2016, 05:58 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(10-31-2016, 05:16 PM)Duffy Wrote:

(10-27-2016, 09:33 PM)Duffy Wrote: Prediction (J34)

Longitude .......... 86' 33' E

Latitude ............. still in progress

Error .................. +/- 2'

Magnitude .......... 6 - 7

Location ............. Nepal / Xizang border region (preliminary)

Start Date .......... 21:33 ut  27th Oct

Expiry Date ........ 00:00 ut  27th Nov

Duffy

...............................................................................................................................................................................

Update ... Latitude is 27' 50' N ... East of Kathmandu, Nepal

Duffy

..........................................................................................................................................................................

Update ... New data relating to this prediction, now places longitude at 84' 10' E ...... signals for true and opposite, over the last 48 hours have been "very" noteworthy !

Duffy  (17:58 ut  6th Nov)

........................................................................................................................................................................

M 5.4 Namche Bazar, Nepal  23:35 ut 27th Nov at bearing 86' 31' E by 27' 50' N

The change to longitude above resulted in a 5.0 opposite reaction in Oklahoma at 01:44 ut on the 7th Nov

However, even though the original longitude stated, and the posted latitude are within 2 miles of epicentre, this prediction cannot be regarded as significant.  I used 26 days of recorded data (that nobody wants to see !) to determine location before I placed this prediction, and it occurred close to expiry with 25 minutes to spare.  The problem is, 5's happen nearly every day, and my 30 day window means it has no significance !.  The strong signal I am currently watching, which relates to 92' E will probably have no significance either !

My enthusiasm for prediction is very low at the moment, so forgive how this may appear.  I use factual data to find these locations, so I am repeating the facts of why this doesn't have relevance .... as told to me !

Latitude determined using ACE data (but ... not for long!)

Duffy