Prediction guidelines
#11
Duffy, you may continue your postings as they are. I was not aware that you were actually working with a group to have your work evaluated. If this format is what they need to do a proper study, then I am willing to accommodate that. The guidelines I posted were not meant to be a hard rule for being allowed to post, but rather what I and others here have through years of experience in analyzing quake predictions found to be the necessary information to make quake predictions useful and allow them to be analyzed fairly and accurately.

I wish you luck and hope the folks at U of Manchester are able to do a fair assessment of your work.

Brian





Signing of Skywise Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Prediction guidelines - by Skywise - 10-10-2016, 12:55 AM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Roger Hunter - 10-10-2016, 01:13 AM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Skywise - 10-10-2016, 02:43 AM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Richter - 10-13-2016, 08:40 AM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Duffy - 10-13-2016, 05:50 PM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Roger Hunter - 10-13-2016, 06:02 PM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Roger Hunter - 10-13-2016, 06:12 PM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Duffy - 10-13-2016, 10:32 PM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Roger Hunter - 10-13-2016, 10:49 PM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Skywise - 10-14-2016, 05:32 AM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Skywise - 10-14-2016, 05:43 AM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Duffy - 10-14-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: Prediction guidelines - by Roger Hunter - 01-15-2017, 04:37 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)