David Nabhan evaluation
#6
(06-08-2014, 12:15 PM)Island Chris Wrote: Roger, that make a lot more sense. With a lot of moons and sunrises/sunsets, if there is no correlation, should be close to chance. At first you suggested a hugely significant anti-correlation, which if true would have meant something.

Chris

Pursuing this investigation a little further, I added mag limits to the program.
I found that mag 6-10 gave prefect chance results whereas mag 5-6 gave extremely negative results.

This makes perfect sense. The database was California quakes and the only tidal correlation ever found was for small shallow angle thrust faults at LOW tide whereas Full and New moons are HIGH tide..

Roger




Reply


Messages In This Thread
David Nabhan evaluation - by Roger Hunter - 06-05-2014, 12:26 AM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Skywise - 06-05-2014, 04:10 AM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Roger Hunter - 06-08-2014, 02:21 AM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Island Chris - 06-08-2014, 12:15 PM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Roger Hunter - 06-22-2014, 07:59 PM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Island Chris - 06-27-2014, 11:57 AM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Roger Hunter - 06-27-2014, 12:24 PM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Island Chris - 06-30-2014, 10:57 AM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Roger Hunter - 06-30-2014, 12:37 PM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Skywise - 07-01-2014, 03:24 AM
RE: David Nabhan evaluation - by Roger Hunter - 07-01-2014, 03:35 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)