[Duffy]

Hi Guy's

New system went online 2 days ago (Now 24/7 monitoring), and as I'd mentioned about posting all strange anomolies, I thought I'd drop these 2 images in the post.

System A

   

You can see the unusual noise level difference at around 06:15 UT (Sunday 15th) compared to the system B image, I'm still calibrating equipment so it
could be human error, but you never know!.

System B

   

Duffy; (anybody miss me ? )

[Roger Hunter]

(03-16-2015, 12:09 AM)Duffy Wrote: Hi Guy's

New system went online 2 days ago (Now 24/7 monitoring), and as I'd mentioned about posting all strange anomolies, I thought I'd drop these 2 images in the post.

You can see the unusual noise level difference at around 06:15 UT (Sunday 15th) compared to the system B image, I'm still calibrating equipment so it
could be human error, but you never know!.


Duffy; (anybody miss me ? )

I did. The images are visual gibberish to me but I'm wondering about the monitoring. How is that done? Analog or digital?

Roger

[Duffy]

(03-16-2015, 02:06 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote:

(03-16-2015, 12:09 AM)Duffy Wrote: Hi Guy's

New system went online 2 days ago (Now 24/7 monitoring), and as I'd mentioned about posting all strange anomolies, I thought I'd drop these 2 images in the post.

You can see the unusual noise level difference at around 06:15 UT (Sunday 15th) compared to the system B image, I'm still calibrating equipment so it
could be human error, but you never know!.


Duffy; (anybody miss me ? )

I did. The images are visual gibberish to me but I'm wondering about the monitoring. How is that done? Analog or digital?

Roger

Hi Roger,

Thanks for the sentiment (I think!),

Monitoring is still analogue, I intend to go digital if and when I can prove this works, (will get a guy in for the task) for the present, I'm working on 100 hour samples for file and emails if necessary.

Changed the old 2001 monitors for 2015 models, and increased battery duration from 7 hours to 18, plus an additional 15 hours of internal backup (might book a very small vacation now!).

Don't worry about the images, all was explained in my tutorials but something ate them, the only feature of interest for our purposs is the Red line at the bottom of the screen (noise line). If the line in system A image is different to the line in system B, it usually means somethings coming for dinner.

Wrong thread and not really my forte, but would solar output at minimum and maximum make any difference to your Sun-Moon angle equations?, or should I just stick to VLF?.

Duffy;

[Roger Hunter]

(03-16-2015, 08:23 PM)Duffy Wrote: Thanks for the sentiment (I think!),

Intended kindly.

Quote:Monitoring is still analogue, I intend to go digital if and when I can prove this works, (will get a guy in for the task) for the present, I'm working on 100 hour samples for file and emails if necessary.

I'm a software guy so can't offer any suggestions. Brian might.

Quote:Changed the old 2001 monitors for 2015 models, and increased battery duration from 7 hours to 18, plus an additional 15 hours of internal backup (might book a very small vacation now!).

Uh huh.

Quote:Don't worry about the images, all was explained in my tutorials but something ate them, the only feature of interest for our purposs is the Red line at the bottom of the screen (noise line). If the line in system A image is different to the line in system B, it usually means somethings coming for dinner.

All that is your problem. You read the graphs and decide when to call a quake. I'll find out how well you are doing.

Quote:Wrong thread and not really my forte, but would solar output at minimum and maximum make any difference to your Sun-Moon angle equations?, or should I just stick to VLF?.

None whatsoever.

Roger