Earthwaves Earth Sciences Forum - Cuba, Italy, Solomons ... What's The Connection ?

I am posting a few details I have researched, in relation to the recent earthquakes in Cuba , Italy and the Solomon Islands. I am not a scientist, so I cannot say if there is anything credible in the correlation I have found between these three notable events. But who knows, it might join a few more dots in the puzzle .....

No 1.

Sunrise in the Solomon Islands at bearing 161' 18' E - 10' 19' S (6.5 epicentre) occurred at 19:06 ut 18th Jan
Sunrise at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S (6th Jan data line) occurred at ........................... 19:06 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 149' 38' E - 5' 22' N (6th Jan data line) occurred at .... 19:06 ut 18th Jan

[attachment=206]

19th Jan M 6.5 Solomon Islands at ................................................................................. 23:04:16 ut
Data feed in ACE satellite EPAM monitor stops at ............................................................. 23:05 ut 19th Jan

[attachment=207]

2 hour version ... Apologies for the lack of detail, the image was an after thought with 5 minutes to spare.

No 2.

Sunrise in Amatrice, Italy at bearing 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N (5.7 epicentre Italy) occurred at .. 06:36 ut 18th Jan
Sunrise at bearing 16' 23' W - 21' 33' S (12th Jan data line) occurred at ............................ 06:36 ut 18th Jan
Transition of day to night at bearing 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N (5.7 epicentre Italy) occurred at .. 17:42 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S (6th Jan data line) occurred at ... 17:42 ut 18th Jan

[attachment=208]

18th Jan M 5.7 , Amatrice, Italy at ................................................................................... 10:14 ut
Disruption in ACE satellite MAG monitor, centred on .......................................................... 10:14 ut 18th Jan

[attachment=209]

18th Jan M 5.6 Amatrice, Italy at ...................................................................................... 10:26 ut
Drop in density in the ACE satellite SWEPAM monitor at ..................................................... 10:26 ut 18th Jan

No 3.

M 5.6 Amatrice, Italy occurred at ..................................................................................... 10:26 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 76' 34' W - 19' 54' N (5.9 epicentre Cuba) occurred at ..10:27 ut 18th Jan
Alternatively 26.6 miles East of this bearing at ..10:26 ut
Calculated source of 01:41 ut data line as centre sun at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S on .................... 6th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 76' 34' W - 19' 54' N (5.9 epicentre Cuba) occurred at .. 10:26 ut 6th Jan

If you google the co-ordinates in the table, and compare sunrise / sunset times and the day / night transition point times, against the earthquake co-ordinates ... they all match ! One bearing that figures in "all three sets" is 156' 12' E ! ... Data from the table is present in "all three sets". The table was posted on 16th Jan 14:01 ut, 19 hours before the first quake listed here occurred ... What's the connection ?

I make no claims that the ACE images posted here have anything to do with earthquakes, but I use this kind of material to procure prediction locations ... and if the data fits the picture ! ....

Duffy

(01-20-2017, 05:42 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]I am posting a few details I have researched, in relation to the recent earthquakes in Cuba , Italy and the Solomon Islands. I am not a scientist, so I cannot say if there is anything credible in the correlation I have found between these three notable events. But who knows, it might join a few more dots in the puzzle .....

No 1.

Sunrise in the Solomon Islands at bearing 161' 18' E - 10' 19' S (6.5 epicentre) occurred at 19:06 ut 18th Jan
Sunrise at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S (6th Jan data line) occurred at ........................... 19:06 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 149' 38' E - 5' 22' N (6th Jan data line) occurred at .... 19:06 ut 18th Jan

19th Jan M 6.5 Solomon Islands at ................................................................................. 23:04:16 ut
Data feed in ACE satellite EPAM monitor stops at ............................................................. 23:05 ut 19th Jan

2 hour version ... Apologies for the lack of detail, the image was an after thought with 5 minutes to spare.

No 2.

Sunrise in Amatrice, Italy at bearing 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N (5.7 epicentre Italy) occurred at .. 06:36 ut 18th Jan
Sunrise at bearing 16' 23' W - 21' 33' S (12th Jan data line) occurred at ............................ 06:36 ut 18th Jan
Transition of day to night at bearing 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N (5.7 epicentre Italy) occurred at .. 17:42 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S (6th Jan data line) occurred at ... 17:42 ut 18th Jan

18th Jan M 5.7 , Amatrice, Italy at ................................................................................... 10:14 ut
Disruption in ACE satellite MAG monitor, centred on .......................................................... 10:14 ut 18th Jan

18th Jan M 5.6 Amatrice, Italy at ...................................................................................... 10:26 ut
Drop in density in the ACE satellite SWEPAM monitor at ..................................................... 10:26 ut 18th Jan

No 3.

M 5.6 Amatrice, Italy occurred at ..................................................................................... 10:26 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 76' 34' W - 19' 54' N (5.9 epicentre Cuba) occurred at ..10:27 ut 18th Jan
Alternatively 26.6 miles East of this bearing at ..10:26 ut
Calculated source of 01:41 ut data line as centre sun at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S on .................... 6th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 76' 34' W - 19' 54' N (5.9 epicentre Cuba) occurred at .. 10:26 ut 6th Jan

If you google the co-ordinates in the table, and compare sunrise / sunset times and the day / night transition point times, against the earthquake co-ordinates ... they all match ! One bearing that figures in "all three sets" is 156' 12' E ! ... Data from the table is present in "all three sets". The table was posted on 16th Jan 14:01 ut, 19 hours before the first quake listed here occurred ... What's the connection ?

I make no claims that the ACE images posted here have anything to do with earthquakes, but I use this kind of material to procure prediction locations ... and if the data fits the picture ! ....

Duffy

Here's some interesting results.

I wrote a program which creates a random date/time and location and then looks for quakes 90 degrees away.
It got very few hits until I widened the hit area to +/- 2 degrees

Then I wrote a similar program which first locates 6+ quakes and then looks for similar 90 degree quakes.
This time I had to narrow the hit bands to +/- 0.5 degrees to get 1/3 hit ratio.

Somethings going on here but I don't know what.

Any ideas?

Roger

(01-21-2017, 12:18 AM)Roger Hunter Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-20-2017, 05:42 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]I am posting a few details I have researched, in relation to the recent earthquakes in Cuba , Italy and the Solomon Islands. I am not a scientist, so I cannot say if there is anything credible in the correlation I have found between these three notable events. But who knows, it might join a few more dots in the puzzle .....

No 1.

Sunrise in the Solomon Islands at bearing 161' 18' E - 10' 19' S (6.5 epicentre) occurred at 19:06 ut 18th Jan
Sunrise at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S (6th Jan data line) occurred at ........................... 19:06 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 149' 38' E - 5' 22' N (6th Jan data line) occurred at .... 19:06 ut 18th Jan

19th Jan M 6.5 Solomon Islands at ................................................................................. 23:04:16 ut
Data feed in ACE satellite EPAM monitor stops at ............................................................. 23:05 ut 19th Jan

2 hour version ... Apologies for the lack of detail, the image was an after thought with 5 minutes to spare.

No 2.

Sunrise in Amatrice, Italy at bearing 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N (5.7 epicentre Italy) occurred at .. 06:36 ut 18th Jan
Sunrise at bearing 16' 23' W - 21' 33' S (12th Jan data line) occurred at ............................ 06:36 ut 18th Jan
Transition of day to night at bearing 13' 19' E - 42' 38' N (5.7 epicentre Italy) occurred at .. 17:42 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S (6th Jan data line) occurred at ... 17:42 ut 18th Jan

18th Jan M 5.7 , Amatrice, Italy at ................................................................................... 10:14 ut
Disruption in ACE satellite MAG monitor, centred on .......................................................... 10:14 ut 18th Jan

18th Jan M 5.6 Amatrice, Italy at ...................................................................................... 10:26 ut
Drop in density in the ACE satellite SWEPAM monitor at ..................................................... 10:26 ut 18th Jan

No 3.

M 5.6 Amatrice, Italy occurred at ..................................................................................... 10:26 ut 18th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 76' 34' W - 19' 54' N (5.9 epicentre Cuba) occurred at ..10:27 ut 18th Jan
Alternatively 26.6 miles East of this bearing at ..10:26 ut
Calculated source of 01:41 ut data line as centre sun at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 29' S on .................... 6th Jan
Transition of night to day at bearing 76' 34' W - 19' 54' N (5.9 epicentre Cuba) occurred at .. 10:26 ut 6th Jan

If you google the co-ordinates in the table, and compare sunrise / sunset times and the day / night transition point times, against the earthquake co-ordinates ... they all match ! One bearing that figures in "all three sets" is 156' 12' E ! ... Data from the table is present in "all three sets". The table was posted on 16th Jan 14:01 ut, 19 hours before the first quake listed here occurred ... What's the connection ?

I make no claims that the ACE images posted here have anything to do with earthquakes, but I use this kind of material to procure prediction locations ... and if the data fits the picture ! ....

Duffy

Here's some interesting results.

I wrote a program which creates a random date/time and location and then looks for quakes 90 degrees away.
It got very few hits until I widened the hit area to +/- 2 degrees

Then I wrote a similar program which first locates 6+ quakes and then looks for similar 90 degree quakes.
This time I had to narrow the hit bands to +/- 0.5 degrees to get 1/3 hit ratio.

Somethings going on here but I don't know what.

Any ideas?

Roger

Update;

The odd results were due to a programming error which allowed quakes to be used more than once.

I've GOT to quit posting preliminary results!

More later.

Roger

I am re-posting an image from the ACE satellite data feed, which is dated 5th January. It' the same image I included in my D32 El Salvador prediction on the same day. Some big events have occurred since, so I thought I would give "my" interpretation of how I read this data. I would imagine anybody that reads this, will have some concept about the speed of light. The data is coming from a satellite designed to monitor activity on the sun. Put simply, light from the sun takes approximately 8 minutes to reach the satellite, which is orbiting 1.5 million kms from Earth. Therefore, I interpret the data as being 8 minutes old , which means what ever elements I use to determine longitude, passed an anomaly on the Earth 8 minutes before. I don't know if this interpretation is correct but it is the one I use. The following is based on T minus 8 minutes , and the screen time shown in brackets.

[attachment=211]

17:32 ut (17:40) Increase ... Centre of sun on 81' 35' W + 7.5 degrees fore / west = .......... 89' 05' W (El Salvador)
                                         Centre of moon on 6' 0' E + 7.25 degrees aft / East = ............. 13' 15' E ( 5.7 Italy 18th)
                                         Transition of night to day, at bearing 156' 12' E - 22' 27' S (6th Jan) occurred at 17:32 ut


17:42 ut (17:50) First peak .. Centre of sun on 84' 05' W + 7.5 degrees aft / East = ............. 76' 35' W ( 5.9 Cuba 17th)

18:02 ut (18:10) Second peak . Centre of sun on .................................................................89' 05' W (El Salvador)

18:12 ut (18:20) Division ... Transition of night to day at bearing 155' 06' E - 6' 12' S (7.9 P.N.G. 22nd) occurred at 18:14 ut

18:22 ut (18:30) third peak .. Centre sun on 94' 05' W + 7.5 degrees fore / West = .......101' 35' W (5.2 Easter Island 22nd)
                                         Transition of night to day at bearing 154' 29' E - 3' 10' S (18th Jan) occurred at .... 18:22 ut

18:36 ut (18:44) Fourth peak .. Sunrise at bearing 166' 31' E - 13' 28' S occurred at 18:36 ut ... (5.7 epicentre Vanuatu 16th)

18:58 ut (19;06) fifth peak       Sunrise at bearing 161' 18' E - 10' 19' S occurred at 18:58 ut .. (6.7 epicentre Solomon's 19th)
                                          Transition of night to day at bearing 149' 38' E - 5' 22' N (6th Jan) occurred at ...... 18:58 ut

[attachment=212]

I took this image off the ACE site yesterday (21st) as shown at the top of the screen shot. I have only done a preliminary assessment of this, but the last 4 structures are the same structures pictured in the 5th Jan image. Also in the 5th Jan image, you can see slight structure in the 310-580 KeV trace before the main one's. The first structure in this image is the same one 16 days later ! If anybody attempts what I have shown, it will suggest the dominant location as Dominican Republic at approx 68' W. Increase point of second structure at 11:12 ut (11:20) is the night to day transition zone on Belize, Guatemala and 89' W El Salvador.  The last structure at 13:06 (13:14) represents Centre of the moon on 89' 21' W longitude ... it is the only bearing that repeats from the 5th Jan data ! Again, this is solely my interpretation so if anybody has been having a bad day due to current affairs, I hope they see this as a pick me up, perhaps something worth considering. Anybody having a good day ... I apologies !

Duffy

(01-22-2017, 11:18 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]I am re-posting an image from the ACE satellite data feed, which is dated 5th January. It' the same image I included in my D32 El Salvador prediction on the same day. Some big events have occurred since, so I thought I would give "my" interpretation of how I read this data. I would imagine anybody that reads this, will have some concept about the speed of light. The data is coming from a satellite designed to monitor activity on the sun. Put simply, light from the sun takes approximately 8 minutes to reach the satellite, which is orbiting 1.5 million kms from Earth. Therefore, I interpret the data as being 8 minutes old , which means what ever elements I use to determine longitude, passed an anomaly on the Earth 8 minutes before. I don't know if this interpretation is correct but it is the one I use.

Roger;

I found an interesting scenario has occurred today, based on my usual prediction method which is described above. The signal times for the space data shown in the first post of the "Post Seismic" thread, are shown to be 19:34 ut and 20:54 ut on the 2nd March. As I have explained, these times are compatible with Dawn and Sunrise on bearing 143' 03' E - 27' 48' N South of Japan. I have also explained these times have not been altered, so what you see is factual data.

If you take these times from 2nd March again, and deduct 8 minutes making them 19:26 ut and 20:46 ut, Dawn and Sunrise then becomes compatible with co-ordinates 145' 12' E - 14' 16' N ... epicentre of the 5.5 Rota Region, Northern Mariana Islands event today (13th).

If the same was applied to the South Atlantic Ridge, it would move the current position from 15' 36' W - 27' 32' S ... to ... 13' 32' W - 27' 26' S. There are 23 days left with this exercise, it will be interesting to see if this scenario plays out in this manner !

Duffy

(03-13-2017, 03:03 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-22-2017, 11:18 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]I am re-posting an image from the ACE satellite data feed, which is dated 5th January. It' the same image I included in my D32 El Salvador prediction on the same day. Some big events have occurred since, so I thought I would give "my" interpretation of how I read this data. I would imagine anybody that reads this, will have some concept about the speed of light. The data is coming from a satellite designed to monitor activity on the sun. Put simply, light from the sun takes approximately 8 minutes to reach the satellite, which is orbiting 1.5 million kms from Earth. Therefore, I interpret the data as being 8 minutes old , which means what ever elements I use to determine longitude, passed an anomaly on the Earth 8 minutes before. I don't know if this interpretation is correct but it is the one I use.

Roger;

I found an interesting scenario has occurred today, based on my usual prediction method which is described above. The signal times for the space data shown in the first post of the "Post Seismic" thread, are shown to be 19:34 ut and 20:54 ut on the 2nd March. As I have explained, these times are compatible with Dawn and Sunrise on bearing 143' 03' E - 27' 48' N South of Japan. I have also explained these times have not been altered, so what you see is factual data.

If you take these times from 2nd March again, and deduct 8 minutes making them 19:26 ut and 20:46 ut, Dawn and Sunrise then becomes compatible with co-ordinates 145' 12' E - 14' 16' N ... epicentre of the 5.5 Rota Region, Northern Mariana Islands event today (13th).

If the same was applied to the South Atlantic Ridge, it would move the current position from 15' 36' W - 27' 32' S ... to ... 13' 32' W - 27' 26' S. There are 23 days left with this exercise, it will be interesting to see if this scenario plays out in this manner !

Duffy

[attachment=241]

This is an image off one of my own monitors this evening, note start of signal with the purple trace at 13:13 ut at bottom of the screen. The Centre of the sun at this time is on longitude 15' 54' W (South Atlantic Ridge), also note the depression in at least 5 traces above, and equally spaced either side of said signal (time wise). The depression is magnetic disruption centred on 13:13 ut. If this signal time was reduced T minus 8 minutes, Centre of the sun would be on longitude 13' 54' W at 13:05 ut.

I posted this image mostly because of the aspect change at 16:00 ut. I don't have enough relevant data to give clarity to it's meaning. But interpreting this as 15:52 ut, Centre moon would be on 136' 41' E longitude. If I further implement my equation of adding 7.15 degrees East, longitude then becomes 143' 56' E (south of Japan).

The equation may be questionable ... but I assure you, the recorded aspect change is genuine !

Duffy

(03-13-2017, 10:07 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-13-2017, 03:03 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-22-2017, 11:18 PM)Duffy Wrote: [ -> ]I am re-posting an image from the ACE satellite data feed, which is dated 5th January. It' the same image I included in my D32 El Salvador prediction on the same day. Some big events have occurred since, so I thought I would give "my" interpretation of how I read this data. I would imagine anybody that reads this, will have some concept about the speed of light. The data is coming from a satellite designed to monitor activity on the sun. Put simply, light from the sun takes approximately 8 minutes to reach the satellite, which is orbiting 1.5 million kms from Earth. Therefore, I interpret the data as being 8 minutes old , which means what ever elements I use to determine longitude, passed an anomaly on the Earth 8 minutes before. I don't know if this interpretation is correct but it is the one I use.

Roger;

I found an interesting scenario has occurred today, based on my usual prediction method which is described above. The signal times for the space data shown in the first post of the "Post Seismic" thread, are shown to be 19:34 ut and 20:54 ut on the 2nd March. As I have explained, these times are compatible with Dawn and Sunrise on bearing 143' 03' E - 27' 48' N South of Japan. I have also explained these times have not been altered, so what you see is factual data.

If you take these times from 2nd March again, and deduct 8 minutes making them 19:26 ut and 20:46 ut, Dawn and Sunrise then becomes compatible with co-ordinates 145' 12' E - 14' 16' N ... epicentre of the 5.5 Rota Region, Northern Mariana Islands event today (13th).

If the same was applied to the South Atlantic Ridge, it would move the current position from 15' 36' W - 27' 32' S ... to ... 13' 32' W - 27' 26' S. There are 23 days left with this exercise, it will be interesting to see if this scenario plays out in this manner !

Duffy

This is an image off one of my own monitors this evening, note start of signal with the purple trace at 13:13 ut at bottom of the screen. The Centre of the sun at this time is on longitude 15' 54' W (South Atlantic Ridge), also note the depression in at least 5 traces above, and equally spaced either side of said signal (time wise). The depression is magnetic disruption centred on 13:13 ut. If this signal time was reduced T minus 8 minutes, Centre of the sun would be on longitude 13' 54' W at 13:05 ut.

I posted this image mostly because of the aspect change at 16:00 ut. I don't have enough relevant data to give clarity to it's meaning. But interpreting this as 15:52 ut, Centre moon would be on 136' 41' E longitude. If I further implement my equation of adding 7.15 degrees East, longitude then becomes 143' 56' E (south of Japan).

The equation may be questionable ... but I assure you, the recorded aspect change is genuine !

Duffy

Duffy;

If you're looking for something you're likely to find it.

For any given time it will be sunrise or sunset in a large number of places.

You are deciding that there is a significant correlation with some particular location.

Ok, fine. What you must show is that this correlation is much higher than chance would allow, but you don't know what chance WOULD allow. My latest program is a step in that direction, showing how many quakes fit one of your centers.

We need to do many more of these as well as many runs on random locations. Only then will you be able to argue convincingly that something real is happening.

Roger